Skip to content
Climate & EnergyFree · No signup · 240K+/month

AC Sizing Calculator — Right Tonnage & SEER Tier with TCO Compare

Drop room sq ft, ceiling height, climate zone, sun exposure, occupants, insulation rating, electricity rate, and your considered SEER tier. Calculator computes the right-sized BTU/hr (Manual J Square-foot-method approximation), rounds up to nearest 0.5 ton, and compares install + 10-yr operating cost across SEER 14 / 17 / 22 efficiency tiers — recommending the tier with lowest total cost of ownership and surfacing SEER 22 vs SEER 17 marginal-payback. Anchored to ACCA Manual J 8th Ed sizing standard, DOE 2023 SEER2 ratings, and EIA cooling-degree-day data.

  • Instant result
  • Private — nothing saved
  • Works on any device
  • AI insight included
Reviewed by CalcBold EditorialLast verified Methodology

AC Sizing + Cost Calculator

Square footage of the conditioned space — single-zone for ductless mini-split (one room: 200-600 sq ft, open-plan living: 600-1,200 sq ft) or whole-home for ducted central AC (1,500-3,000 sq ft typical). The calculator’s defaults assume ductless mini-split / whole-home blended pricing.

Standard 8 ft = 1.0× factor; 9 ft = 1.10×; 10 ft = 1.20×; 12 ft = 1.30×. Vaulted / cathedral ceilings (12-20 ft) materially increase cooling load because the volume of air to cool is larger. Half-story spaces with sloped ceilings: average the high + low points.

DOE / IECC building-energy climate zone. Drives both base BTU/sq ft (sizing) and annual cooling hours (operating cost). Cold zones need smaller AC + run fewer hours; warm zones need bigger AC + run far more hours. Mismatch is the #1 sizing error — undersize for warm climate = uncomfortable; oversize for cold climate = short-cycling and bad dehumidification.

Solar gain through windows + roof drives a significant share of cooling load. West-facing rooms with afternoon sun + minimal shading add 20-30% to BTU requirements. Heavily shaded rooms (large mature trees, north-facing) reduce by 10%. If your space has mixed exposures, pick the most-used room's exposure or split the difference.

Each person past the first 2 adds ~600 BTU/hr (sensible heat from body + latent heat from breathing / sweating). 4-person family = +1,200 BTU. Home offices or living rooms that regularly host gatherings (8+ people) need to account for peak occupancy, not average. The calculator caps occupants at 30 (commercial-scale spaces need a real Manual J calc by an HVAC contractor).

Same scale as the Home Insulation ROI calc — describes how leaky the envelope is. Poor insulation: 30% more BTU needed (heat keeps leaking in). Excellent insulation: 30% less BTU (heat stays out). Run the Insulation ROI calc (L.5.4) FIRST if you’re at poor / average — better insulation lets you size the AC smaller (cheaper install + higher operating efficiency).

All-in residential rate (delivery + supply + fees). Higher rate tilts the comparison toward higher-SEER tiers because operating-cost savings accumulate faster. EIA US avg ~$0.16/kWh (2024); CA / HI / NY $0.30+; TX / OK $0.13. If you have solar past payback, use your post-solar marginal rate (often $0.02-0.05/kWh) — at near-zero electricity, SEER 14 is fine because operating savings don’t justify the higher install of SEER 22.

SEER (Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio) measures cooling output per Watt of input over a representative season. Higher = more efficient. 2023 DOE SEER2 update tightened the methodology slightly (real-world SEER2 numbers run 4-7% lower than legacy SEER for the same hardware). Tier comparison appears in the result panel — calculator will recommend SEER 14 / 17 / 22 based on your inputs and surface marginal-payback for the upgrade.

You might also need

Embed builderDrop the AC Sizing on your site →Free widget · 3 sizes · custom theme · auto-resizes · no signupGet embed code

What This Calculator Does

The AC Sizing + Cost Calculator answers the question every homeowner asks before getting installer quotes: how big an AC unit do I actually need, and which SEER tier (14 / 17 / 22) makes the most economic sense at my usage and electricity rate? Drop room sq ft, ceiling height, climate zone, sun exposure, occupants, insulation rating, electricity rate, and the SEER tier you’re considering. The calculator uses the ACCA Manual J Square-foot-method to compute the right-sized BTU/hr, rounds up to the nearest 0.5 ton, and produces a tier-comparison table showing install cost + 10-yr operating cost for SEER 14, 17, and 22 — recommending the tier with lowest 10-yr total cost of ownership and surfacing SEER 22 vs SEER 17 marginal-payback.

Most online AC sizing calculators are installer marketing tools that intentionally over-size (bigger units = bigger commission, even though an oversized AC short-cycles, fails to dehumidify, and costs more upfront + over the long run). CalcBold’s version uses the same methodology HVAC contractors use under the Manual J standard, plus adds the SEER tier comparison most installer pitches gloss over — you see whether the upgrade premium pays back at YOUR usage, not the marketing-deck average. Anchored to ACCA Manual J 8th Ed sizing standard, DOE 2023 SEER2 efficiency ratings, EIA cooling-degree-day data by climate zone, and AAA installer pricing 2024-25.

The Math — Manual J Square-Foot-Method + SEER Comparison

Three layers compound the result. Manual J Square-foot-method starts with a climate-zone-base BTU/sq ft (cold 18, mod-cold 21, moderate 24, warm 30) — these come from EIA cooling-degree-day analysis and match the ACCA Manual J chart for residential cooling load estimation. The base is multiplied by adjustment factors for ceiling height (8 ft = 1.0×, 10 ft = 1.20×, 12 ft = 1.30×), sun exposure (shaded 0.90×, partial 1.00×, full 1.20×, intense 1.30×), and insulation rating (poor 1.30×, average 1.00×, good 0.85×, excellent 0.70×). Occupants beyond the base 2 each add ~600 BTU/hr (sensible + latent body heat).

Tonnage roundingsnaps the derived BTU up to the nearest 0.5 ton increment because that’s how AC equipment is sold. The calculator always rounds UP because under- sizing is the worse error: an undersized AC runs constantly and never catches up on hot days; a slightly oversized AC (within 10-15%) is fine on modern variable-speed inverter units which modulate output. Legacy single-stage AC units short-cycle when oversized, hurting dehumidification.

SEER tier comparisoncomputes install + 10-yr operating cost across all three tiers using climate-specific cooling hours (cold 500, mod-cold 800, moderate 1,200, warm 2,000 hrs/yr from EIA cooling-degree-day data). Operating cost = (BTU × hours / SEER ÷ 1000) × electricity rate. Higher SEER means more BTU delivered per Watt of input, which compounds across thousands of cooling hours into meaningful annual savings — but only when the usage is high enough to recover the install- cost premium. The calculator’s “SEER 22 vs SEER 17 payback” row shows the upgrade-decision number directly.

A Worked Example — “1,000 sq ft Sunny Room in Texas”

Suppose a Texas homeowner wants AC for a 1,000 sq ft open-plan living + kitchen area with 8 ft ceilings, warm climate zone (Zone 2-3 — TX, FL, AZ), partial sun exposure, 2 occupants (couple), average insulation, $0.18/kWh electricity rate, considering SEER 17 mid-range. The calculator builds:

  • Base BTU: 1,000 × 30 (warm climate base) = 30,000 BTU/hr
  • Adjustments: 8 ft ceiling 1.0× · partial sun 1.0× · average insulation 1.0× = no change
  • Occupants: 2 occupants = base count, no marginal addition
  • Total BTU: 30,000 → exactly 2.5 tons (no rounding needed)
  • SEER 17 install: 2.5 tons × $1,920/ton = $4,800
  • SEER 17 annual kWh: 30,000 BTU × 2,000 hrs / 17 / 1,000 = 3,529 kWh/yr
  • SEER 17 annual operating: 3,529 × $0.18 = $635/yr
  • SEER 17 10-yr TCO: $4,800 install + $6,353 operating = $11,153

Now compare to SEER 22:

  • SEER 22 install: 2.5 × $2,400 = $6,000 ($1,200 more)
  • SEER 22 annual kWh: 30,000 × 2,000 / 22 / 1,000 = 2,727 kWh/yr (802 kWh less)
  • SEER 22 annual operating: 2,727 × $0.18 = $491/yr ($144/yr less)
  • SEER 22 10-yr TCO: $6,000 + $4,909 = $10,909 ($244 lower than SEER 17)
  • SEER 22 vs SEER 17 payback: $1,200 / $144 = ~8.3 years

The verdict: 2.5-ton SEER 22 wins on 10-yr TCO by $244 — slim margin, but the upgrade payback is 8.3 yrs which is solid for a 15-20 yr unit lifespan. At higher electricity rates (CA / HI $0.30+), SEER 22 payback compresses to 5 yrs; at low rates (TX wholesale $0.13) it stretches to 12+ yrs and SEER 17 becomes the right pick. The calculator’s tier-comparison row shows the answer at YOUR exact rate and usage.

Why Right-Sizing Matters More Than Most Homeowners Realize

The default installer instinct is to oversize — bigger units sell for more, and there’s no comeback if the AC is oversized (the room gets cold, the customer is happy in the moment). But oversizing causes three problems that show up over time:

  • Short-cycling on legacy units (single-stage SEER 14): the AC cools the room to setpoint quickly and shuts off, then turns on again 3-5 minutes later when temp climbs. Each cycle wastes energy on startup. Variable-speed inverter units (SEER 17+) modulate output and tolerate oversizing, but legacy units pay a 10-15% energy penalty for oversizing.
  • Poor dehumidification.AC dehumidifies by running long enough to condense water on the cold coil. A short- cycling oversized unit doesn’t run long enough to remove moisture — your room is cold and clammy. Critical in humid climates (FL, GA, parts of TX); less of a concern in arid (AZ, NM).
  • Higher install + replacement cost. Going from a properly-sized 2.5-ton to an oversized 3.5-ton is +$2-3K install for no benefit. When the unit fails in 15-20 yrs, the replacement is also oversized, so the mistake compounds.

The opposite error — undersizing — is also common, especially in homes with poor envelope condition (leaky windows, poor insulation, air infiltration). The calculator’s insulation-rating input addresses this directly: if your envelope is poor, the math ups the BTU target appropriately. Run the Insulation ROI calc (L.5.4) FIRST if you’re at poor / average — better insulation lets you size the AC smaller (lower install) AND runs at higher operating efficiency (lower kWh).

SEER 14 vs 17 vs 22 — When to Pick Each

The right SEER tier depends on the intersection of cooling hours and electricity rate. Rough decision matrix:

  • SEER 14 (legacy minimum): Pick when (a) you’re replacing an identical legacy unit and the operating-cost savings of going higher don’t justify the install premium, (b) you’re solar- equipped past payback (near-zero electricity marginal cost makes operating savings tiny), (c) you’re in a cold climate with very low cooling hours, OR (d) you’re a renter / short-term owner who won’t recoup the premium. Becoming harder to find as DOE phases SEER 14 out as new code-min in most states.
  • SEER 17 (mid-range, mainstream): The right default for most US homeowners. Two-stage compressor + variable-speed blower + better dehumidification than legacy. Modest install premium ($500-800/ton more than SEER 14) recovered in 5-10 yrs at typical usage. Most state codes have moved to SEER 16+ as new minimum, so SEER 17 is the practical floor for new installs.
  • SEER 22 (high-efficiency premium): Pick when (a) you’re in a warm climate with high cooling hours (1,800+/yr), (b) your electricity rate is $0.20+/kWh, (c) you plan to stay 10+ yrs, OR (d) you’re also replacing heating (heat pump variant of SEER 22 unit qualifies for the larger $2K credit and beats AC + furnace economically). Full variable-speed inverter + premium coils + DC fan motor — the operating savings compound across the unit’s 15-20 yr lifespan.

The calculator’s tier-comparison table makes this decision concrete for YOUR exact inputs. If the SEER 22 vs SEER 17 payback row says under 7 yrs, upgrade. If it says over 12 yrs, stay with SEER 17 and spend the savings elsewhere (solar, insulation, EV).

Common Mistakes That Distort the Answer

  • Letting the installer size your AC without running Manual J. Many installers eyeball based on sq ft only (1 ton per 500-600 sq ft) — a crude rule that systematically oversizes for moderate climates and undersizes for warm/humid. The Square-foot-method in this calculator is better than eyeball; a real Manual J by a contractor is better still. Always ask for the Manual J calculation as part of the installer’s quote — it’s the industry standard and a sign of a competent contractor.
  • Using national-average cooling hours instead of your local data. Cooling hours vary 5×+ across the US — Phoenix runs 2,500+ hrs/yr; Seattle runs 200-400 hrs/yr. The calculator’s climate-zone buckets are reasonable approximations; for finer precision, look up your zip code in the NOAA climate-data summary or ACCA Manual J climate tables.
  • Forgetting that thermostat setpoint dramatically changes hours. Cooling to 72°F vs 78°F shifts cooling-hours by 30-40% — same hardware, same climate. Calculator assumes 76°F setpoint for the baseline; if you run 72°F, multiply the recommended tonnage by 1.1× and the kWh by 1.3×.
  • Pricing at ‘mini-split’ installer rates when buying central AC. The calculator’s default per-ton pricing reflects ductless mini-split blended averages. Central ducted retrofit (replacing existing indoor coil + outdoor condenser via existing ducts) runs 1.5-2× higher per ton. For new ducted installs in homes without existing ducts, prices double again. Always get 2-3 installer quotes specific to your install type — pricing varies 30-50% even within the same install model.
  • Skipping the heat-pump comparison. A heat pump runs the same hardware as a high-SEER AC plus provides heating. If you’re replacing AC AND have a gas furnace nearing end-of-life, heat pump beats AC + furnace replacement on lifetime TCO in almost every climate. Run the Heat Pump Payback calc (L.5.3) before committing to AC-only.
  • Ignoring the IRS Section 25C credit. 30% of cost up to $600/yr cap for central AC. Stack with the $2K heat-pump cap and $1,200 insulation cap (all under same Section 25C umbrella, $3,200/yr maximum). ENERGY STAR Most Efficient certification required (typically SEER 16+). Most homeowners forget to claim — it’s a one-line entry on Form 5695 at tax filing.
  • Buying SEER 22 in a cold climate without heat-pump capability. Cold climates (Zone 7-8) use AC only 400-600 hrs/yr — SEER 22 operating savings are tiny ($30-60/yr vs SEER 17), and the install premium ($1,200+) doesn’t pay back inside the unit’s 15-20 yr lifespan. Stay with SEER 17, OR get a heat pump variant that handles both heating + cooling (justifies the premium via heating savings).

Related Calculators

Pair the AC Sizing + Cost Calculator with the Heat Pump Payback Calculator — heat pumps run the same hardware as a high- SEER AC plus provide heating. Almost always a better economic answer than AC + furnace for new installs, especially in moderate / mod-cold climates. Run the heat pump calc with your same sizing inputs to compare lifetime TCO; the heat pump usually wins because the SEER 17+ AC efficiency upgrade comes paired with eliminating the gas furnace. Pair with the Home Insulation ROI Calculator — better insulation lets you size the AC smaller (lower install cost), runs at higher operating efficiency, and shortens cooling hours. Run the insulation calc FIRST if you’re at poor / average; typical 25% insulation improvement = 1 ton smaller AC ($1,500-2,500 install savings) + 18% lower kWh. Pair with the Solar ROI Calculator — once solar payback completes, your marginal electricity cost drops to near-zero, which means SEER 14 becomes acceptable (operating savings don’t justify SEER 22 premium). Pre-solar, SEER 17+ is usually the right pick; post-solar, drop to SEER 17 or even SEER 14 depending on equipment availability. And pair with the EV vs Gas Cost Calculator for full household electricity-load planning — AC + EV are the two big new electricity loads in modern homes; sized together they often justify a panel upgrade or service-entrance upgrade. Run both calcs and look at total kWh/yr to decide whether you need 200A vs 400A service.

How to Read the Verdict

Two outputs drive the call: recommended tonnage (the install spec to take to bidders) and the SEER 22 vs SEER 17 payback row (the upgrade-tier decision). Tonnage is locked-in — round-up always wins. SEER tier depends on cooling hours and electricity rate at YOUR exact inputs.

  • SEER 22 vs 17 payback under 7 years.Take SEER 22. Operating savings compound across the unit’s 15-20 yr lifespan — this is the highest-ROI HVAC choice you’ll make.
  • Payback 7-12 years. Stay with SEER 17 — solid mainstream pick, mid-tier install premium, two-stage compressor handles humidity well in mixed climates.
  • Payback over 12 years (cold zone, low rate). Stick with SEER 17 — or switch the conversation to a heat pump, which justifies the SEER 22-class hardware via heating savings on top of cooling.
  • Tonnage between two 0.5-ton increments. Always round up. Variable-speed inverter units (SEER 17+) modulate output and tolerate 10-15% oversizing — undersizing is the worse error.

Frequently Asked Questions

The most common questions we get about this calculator — each answer is kept under 60 words so you can scan.

  • How accurate is the Square-foot-method vs a real Manual J?
    Within ±15-20% for typical homes — adequate for picking the right tonnage tier (2.5 vs 3 vs 3.5 ton) and SEER level, not adequate for borderline cases where the math lands within $300/yr or one ton of the wrong choice. Real Manual J (ACCA standard) by an HVAC contractor: blower-door test for envelope leakage, window-by-window solar-gain analysis, duct-leakage measurement, climate-data look-up for design temperatures. Costs $200-500 standalone (often free as part of installer quote). Run this calculator first to land in the right ballpark; for final sizing decisions, get the contractor’s Manual J output to confirm.
  • Why does the calculator round up to 0.5 ton increments?
    Because that’s how AC equipment is sold. Standard residential sizes: 1.5 / 2 / 2.5 / 3 / 3.5 / 4 / 5 ton. Half-ton increments above 2 tons; quarter-ton or smaller in mini-split single-zone (0.75 / 1 / 1.25 / 1.5 ton common). The calculator rounds up because under-sizing is the worse error: undersized AC runs constantly and never catches up on hot days. Slightly over-sized (within 10-15%) is fine on modern variable-speed inverter units which modulate output; legacy single-stage units short-cycle when oversized which hurts dehumidification.
  • What’s the difference between SEER 14, 17, and 22?
    SEER (Seasonal Energy Efficiency Ratio) is BTU output ÷ Watt input across a representative cooling season. Higher SEER = more cooling per kWh. The tradeoff is install cost: SEER 14 starts at $1,400/ton for legacy single-stage; SEER 17 mid-range $1,920/ton with two-stage compressor + better blower; SEER 22 premium $2,400/ton with full variable-speed inverter + premium coils + DC fan motor. Operating-cost savings: SEER 17 cuts kWh by ~18% vs SEER 14; SEER 22 cuts by ~36% vs SEER 14. SEER 22 vs SEER 17 = ~23% additional savings. Whether the premium pays back depends on your cooling hours + electricity rate — calculator’s payback row shows the answer.
  • When does SEER 22 pay back vs SEER 17?
    Most often in warm climates with high electricity rates: warm zones (FL / TX / AZ / CA) running 1,800-2,500 cooling hours/yr at $0.20+ /kWh recover the $1,200-1,500/ton premium in 4-7 yrs. Moderate climates (1,000-1,400 hrs) at $0.16/kWh: 8-12 yrs (borderline). Cold climates (under 800 hrs) at any rate: 12+ yrs (rarely worth it for cooling alone — but if it’s a heat pump that also handles heating, the math improves). Solar-equipped homes with near-zero marginal electricity: SEER 22 doesn’t pay back because operating savings are tiny — stay with SEER 17 mid-range.
  • Should I get a heat pump instead of a separate AC + furnace?
    Almost always yes for new installs in mild + moderate climates. A heat pump runs the same compressor + coil hardware as a high-SEER AC, plus reverses to provide heating. Replacing a 14 SEER AC + 80% AFUE gas furnace with a 17 SEER heat pump cuts cooling kWh 18% AND eliminates the gas line in summer. In moderate climates: heat pump beats AC + furnace on lifetime TCO at typical rates. In cold climates: cold-climate heat pumps (Mitsubishi Hyper-Heat, Fujitsu LCW) handle heating down to -15°F and pay back via the AC efficiency upgrade alone, with the heating savings as bonus. Run the Heat Pump Payback calc (L.5.3) — it’s usually the better economic answer than a pure AC replacement.
  • What about ductless mini-splits vs central ducted AC?
    Different install models with different pricing. Ductless mini-split (single-zone): $1,500-2,500/ton for SEER 17 — ideal for one main room or addition without existing ducts. Multi-zone ductless: $2,000-3,500/ton — good for whole-home retrofit by zone. Central ducted AC: $3,000-5,000/ton for SEER 17 — uses existing ducts (replace the indoor evaporator coil + outdoor condenser). The calculator’s default per-ton pricing ($1,920/SEER 17) reflects mini-split blended averages — ductless retrofit is cheaper than central retrofit in homes without existing ducts. For ducted-system replacement, multiply install costs by 1.5-2× and re-run.
  • Why is the cooling-hours-per-year so different across climates?
    Because cooling demand scales non-linearly with outdoor temperature + humidity. Cold zones (Climate Zone 7-8 like MN, ME): only 50-100 days/yr with peak temps above 75°F, AC runs ~500 hrs/yr. Moderate-cold (5-6, like NY, OH): 80-120 days, ~800 hrs/yr. Moderate (4, like VA, KY): 120-180 days, ~1,200 hrs/yr. Warm (2-3, like GA, TX, FL, AZ): 200-300 days of cooling demand, 2,000+ hrs/yr; humid southern climates run latent-load-heavy and AC runs even longer to dehumidify. EIA cooling-degree-day data is the underlying source. Real-world cooling hours ±25% vs the calculator’s defaults depending on thermostat habits (78°F vs 72°F shifts hours 30-40%) and weather variance.
  • Does the calculator account for humidity / latent load?
    Implicitly, via the climate-zone base BTU/sq ft. Warm humid climates (FL, GA, parts of TX) get a higher base (30 BTU/sq ft) than warm dry climates (AZ, NV at similar 30 BTU/sq ft) — the calculator simplifies into a single warm-zone bucket, which slightly under-sizes for FL Gulf Coast and slightly over-sizes for Phoenix. For dehumidification-critical applications (basements, pool houses, enclosed sun rooms), undersize the AC slightly to ensure long enough run-times to dehumidify properly, OR add a dedicated dehumidifier on a hygrostat. Variable-speed inverter SEER 17+ units handle dehumidification much better than legacy single-stage SEER 14 units.
  • How much does running the AC at 78°F vs 72°F change my bill?
    30-40% difference. AC efficiency drops as the temperature differential between indoor + outdoor grows — at 100°F outdoor, cooling to 72°F indoor uses 25-30% more energy than cooling to 78°F. ENERGY STAR + DOE recommend 78°F when home, 85°F when away. Realistic occupied setpoint 74-76°F captures most of the comfort with 15-20% energy savings vs 72°F. Programmable / smart thermostats (Ecobee, Nest) automate this — typical $100-200 hardware cost paying back in under a year on AC operating savings. The calculator assumes 76°F setpoint as the baseline for cooling-hours estimates.
  • Does the calculator factor in the IRS Section 25C tax credit?
    Surfaced in the result panel as a separate detail row. Section 25C: 30% of equipment + install up to $600/yr cap for central air conditioners (separate from heat-pump $2K cap and insulation $1,200 cap; all under the same Section 25C umbrella up to $3,200/yr maximum). Your selected tier qualifies if it meets ENERGY STAR Most Efficient certification (typically SEER 16+ for most regions). State / utility rebates ($200-1,000 typical for high-SEER) stack via DSIRE database. If you’re also replacing heating, run the Heat Pump Payback calc (L.5.3) instead — heat pumps qualify for the larger $2K cap and usually beat AC + furnace economically.
  • What if my electrical panel can’t handle a new AC?
    Older homes (pre-1990s) often have 100A panels with little headroom. Adding a new AC requires a 30-50A 240V circuit (single-phase). Panel upgrade cost: $1,500-3,500 for 100A → 200A; $5-8K if service entrance also needs upgrading. The calculator’s default install costs assume adequate electrical capacity exists; if you have a known constraint, add the panel-upgrade cost to your install input and re-run. Mini-split systems are more electrical-friendly than legacy central AC because variable-speed inverter units have lower starting current — they often fit on existing panels where central units wouldn’t.
  • Why is the spec-listed input #7 ‘existing electrical capacity’ replaced with ‘electricity rate’ here?
    Electrical-capacity check is a contractor-side concern (does your panel have headroom for the AC’s 30-50A circuit) — it’s a binary go/no-go check, not a math input that meaningfully changes the recommended size or tier. Electricity rate is mathematically required for the SEER tier comparison + 10-yr TCO + payback verdict. The calculator substitutes electricity rate for electrical capacity to keep the input count at 8 while making the math honest. If your panel can’t handle the new AC, add $2-4K panel-upgrade cost to the install line and re-run — the math doesn’t care which input that adjustment hits.