Skip to content
FinanceFree · No signup · 2M+/month

Free Retirement Savings Calculator — Future Value + 4% Rule + FIRE Number

Project your retirement nest egg using future-value math with monthly compounding. Enter current age, target retirement age, present savings, annual contribution, and expected return — get the future value, the 4% safe-withdrawal income, and your FIRE number.

  • Instant result
  • Private — nothing saved
  • Works on any device
  • AI insight included
Reviewed by CalcBold Editorial · Sources: IRS 401(k)/IRA limits 2026 + SSA full-retirement-age schedule + Trinity Study (1998) + FRED historical S&P returnsLast verified Methodology

Retirement Savings Calculator

Your age today.

When you plan to stop working.

Total in 401(k), IRA, brokerage, etc combined.

Total per year — yours + any employer match.

7% is the long-run S&P 500 real return; 5% is conservative; 10% is optimistic.

If known, calculates years-of-support + FIRE number. Leave 0 to skip.

Live · interactive

Compound growth — year-by-year projection

See how much of your final balance comes from contributions vs. compounding. The dashed line marks your target.

Final balance: $1,644,514 · on track — you clear the target by $144,514.
Embed builderDrop the Retirement on your site →Free widget · 3 sizes · custom theme · auto-resizes · no signupGet embed code

What This Calculator Does

This tool projects how much money you will have at retirement given your current savings, annual contributions, years remaining, and expected return. It then converts that future balance into three numbers people actually need: the 4% rule annual income (how much you can safely withdraw each year), the FIRE number(the savings target that lets you retire indefinitely), and — if you enter a target spending amount — how many years your portfolio will last. The math is the standard future-value-of-an-annuity formula used by every 401(k) plan provider, actuary, and financial planner, applied with monthly compounding so projections match how real accounts actually grow.

Most retirement calculators stop at the raw balance. This one goes further: it asks what can you spend from that balance?That translation — from a pile of dollars to an annual income stream you can sustain for 30 or more years — is where most retirement planning fails. A $1.5M balance sounds comfortable until you realize it supports only $60,000 per year under the 4% rule, before taxes, before inflation adjustments, and before sequence-of-returns risk takes its cut.

The Future-Value Formula Explained

Your projected retirement balance is the sum of two compounding streams: the lump sum you already have, and the contributions you will add over time. Each follows a slightly different formula; added together, they give your total projected balance.

Retirement Future Value (Monthly Compounding)

FV = P × (1 + r/12)^(12t) + PMT × [((1 + r/12)^(12t) − 1) ÷ (r/12)]
where P = current savings, PMT = monthly contribution (annual ÷ 12), r = annual return rate (decimal), t = years to retirement

The first term compounds your existing savings at the monthly periodic rate for all 12t months. The second term is the future value of an annuity — the sum of all monthly contributions, each compounding for however many months remain before retirement. The earliest contributions compound the longest and carry the most weight; contributions made in the last year barely compound at all. This is why starting early dominates contributing large amounts late.

Source:IRS — Retirement Topics: Contributions· Internal Revenue Service

The 4% rule translates the future balance into annual income. Divide the projected balance by 25 to find the safe annual withdrawal, or multiply your desired annual spend by 25 to find the FIRE number you need to accumulate. Both operations are the same arithmetic flipped: a 4% withdrawal rate on a $2M portfolio is $80,000/year; a $80,000/year spending goal requires a $2M portfolio.

4% Rule Safe Withdrawal / FIRE Number

Annual income = FV × 0.04       FIRE number = annual spend × 25
The 0.04 withdrawal rate (4%) was calibrated on 1926–2015 US market data. The 25× multiplier is its direct algebraic inverse.

The Trinity Study (Cooley, Hubbard, Walz 1998) found that a diversified 50–75% equity portfolio sustained a 4% inflation-adjusted withdrawal in 95%+ of 30-year historical windows. For retirements longer than 30 years — early retirees especially — most updated research (Bengen 2021, Morningstar 2023) suggests 3.3–3.7%, implying a FIRE multiple of 27–30×.

Source:Saving and Investing for Retirement· U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Three Worked Examples

Three realistic scenarios computed with the same formula this calculator uses. Copy any set of inputs into the fields above to reproduce the full result card, then experiment with your own numbers.

Example 1

Early starter — $12,000/year from age 30 to 65

Current age
30
Retirement age
65 (35-year horizon)
Current savings
$10,000
Annual contribution
$12,000
Expected return
7% (real)
  1. Monthly contribution = annual ÷ 12.

    12,000 ÷ 12 = $1,000 / month
  2. Compound existing $10,000 for 35 years at 7% monthly.

    10,000 × (1 + 0.07/12)^420 = 10,000 × 11.408 = $114,080
  3. Future value of $1,000/month annuity for 420 months at 7%.

    1,000 × [((1.005833)^420 − 1) ÷ 0.005833] = 1,000 × 1,945.9 = $1,945,900
  4. Sum the two streams for total projected balance.

    114,080 + 1,945,900 ≈ $2,060,000
  5. 4% rule annual income from the projected balance.

    2,060,000 × 0.04 = $82,400 / year

Projected balance $2,060,000. The 4% rule delivers $82,400/year. Total contributed: $10,000 + ($12,000 × 35) = $430,000. Compounding contributed $1,630,000 — 3.8× the actual contributions.

This is the fundamental demonstration of time's dominance over amount. A modest $1,000/month, started at 30 and left alone for 35 years, does 80% of the work through compounding rather than savings.

Example 2

Late starter — $20,000/year from age 45 to 65

Current age
45
Retirement age
65 (20-year horizon)
Current savings
$50,000
Annual contribution
$20,000
Expected return
7% (real)
  1. Monthly contribution = $20,000 ÷ 12.

    20,000 ÷ 12 = $1,666.67 / month
  2. Compound existing $50,000 for 20 years (240 months).

    50,000 × (1.005833)^240 = 50,000 × 3.870 = $193,500
  3. Future value of $1,666.67/month annuity for 240 months.

    1,666.67 × [((1.005833)^240 − 1) ÷ 0.005833] = 1,666.67 × 530.6 = $884,400
  4. Total projected balance.

    193,500 + 884,400 ≈ $1,078,000
  5. 4% rule income and gap analysis.

    1,078,000 × 0.04 = $43,100 / year — below a typical $60–80K retirement need

Projected balance $1,078,000 — roughly half of Example 1's balance despite contributing $20,000/year versus $12,000/year. The 15 lost years of compounding cost more than the extra $8,000/year in contributions.

The late-starter’s most powerful lever is rarely a larger contribution — those hit IRS limits quickly. The real move is extending the timeline: working 5 more years both adds compounding and shrinks the withdrawal period.

Example 3

FIRE scenario — aggressive savings from age 25, retire at 50

Current age
25
Retirement age
50 (25-year horizon)
Current savings
$20,000
Annual contribution
$30,000
Expected return
7% (real)
Target annual withdrawal
$80,000
  1. Monthly contribution = $30,000 ÷ 12.

    30,000 ÷ 12 = $2,500 / month
  2. Compound existing $20,000 for 25 years (300 months).

    20,000 × (1.005833)^300 = 20,000 × 5.809 = $116,180
  3. Future value of $2,500/month annuity for 300 months.

    2,500 × [((1.005833)^300 − 1) ÷ 0.005833] = 2,500 × 810.7 = $2,026,750
  4. Total balance vs FIRE number for $80,000/year withdrawal.

    FV = $2,142,930 vs FIRE number = $80,000 × 25 = $2,000,000

Projected balance $2,143,000 — clears the $2,000,000 FIRE number by roughly $143,000. However: at a 25-year horizon, a 3.5% withdrawal rate is safer than 4%, implying a 28.6× FIRE number of $2,286,000. The plan is close but not yet in the comfortable margin.

Dropping the expected return to 5% (a reasonable stress test) cuts the projected balance to about $1.52M — $480,000 short of the FIRE number. Every FIRE plan should be run at both the base case and the 5% stress case.

Contribution Rate by Scenario — What Does It Take?

The most practical question is not what you will have, but what you need to contribute to reach a specific goal. The table below holds the retirement age at 65, the return at 7%, and varies only the starting age and current savings. Each row shows the annual contribution needed to accumulate $1.5M — a target that supports roughly $60,000/year under the 4% rule.

Target: $1,500,000 at 65 · 7% real return

Annual contribution required to reach $1.5M depending on when you start

Annual contribution required to reach $1.5M depending on when you start
ScenarioStarting savingsYears to goAnnual contribution neededMonthly needed
Start at 25Recommended$5,00040 years$4,140 / yr$345 / mo
Start at 30$10,00035 years$6,510 / yr$543 / mo
Start at 35$25,00030 years$10,620 / yr$885 / mo
Start at 45$50,00020 years$27,900 / yr$2,325 / mo
Start at 55$100,00010 years$82,400 / yr$6,867 / mo

Numbers computed with the FV annuity formula at 7% real return, monthly compounding. The 25-year-old’s required contribution is 20× lower than the 55-year-old’s for the same goal — a direct measure of compounding’s power. Starting 10 years earlier roughly halves the required monthly contribution.

How to Use This Calculator

  1. Enter your current age and retirement age. The gap between them is the compounding horizon — the single most powerful input in the formula. Every extra year compounds on the previous year’s growth; at 7%, a 35-year horizon is worth roughly twice as much as a 25-year horizon per dollar contributed.
  2. Enter your current retirement savings— the total balance across every account you earmark for retirement: 401(k), Traditional IRA, Roth IRA, Roth 401(k), taxable brokerage, HSA. Do not include emergency funds or cash you plan to spend in the next decade. Include your current 401(k) balance at its statement value, not any estimate of future contributions.
  3. Enter your annual contribution — the total you and your employer will add this year. For a 401(k) with a 50% employer match on the first 6% of a $100,000 salary, that is $18,000 of your own contributions plus $3,000 of match = $21,000 total. The calculator divides by 12 internally; monthly cadence is correctly captured.
  4. Enter your expected annual return. The default of 7% reflects the long-run real return of a diversified 70/30 stock-bond portfolio. For a more conservative stress test, use 5%. For an optimistic scenario (heavier equity allocation, younger investor), 8–9% is defensible. See the section below on realistic return assumptions.
  5. Optionally, enter a target annual withdrawal— what you plan to spend per year in retirement (in today’s dollars). The calculator returns your FIRE number (25× that amount), whether your projected balance clears it, and approximately how many years the portfolio will sustain that withdrawal before depletion.

What Is a Realistic Expected Return?

The 7% default is a deliberate compromise. The S&P 500’s nominal return from 1928–2024 averages approximately 10%; subtract 3% long-run inflation and you get roughly 7% real. A balanced 70/30 stock-bond portfolio has historically delivered 6.5–7% real over rolling 30-year windows. But three forces push the honest planning number lower:

  • Starting valuations matter.Historical research consistently shows that high CAPE ratios (cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings) predict below-average forward returns. Most major asset managers — Vanguard, BlackRock, Research Affiliates — project US equities at 4–6% real over the coming decade from 2026 starting valuations, not 7%.
  • Glide-path drag.A portfolio that starts 90% equity at 30 will typically drift toward 40–50% equity by 65 as you reduce risk. Bond returns are structurally lower than stock returns; as the equity share declines, so does the blended return. The calculator uses a single constant rate — but reality is a declining return as you age. Model the last decade at 1–2% below your accumulation assumption.
  • Fee drag compounds mercilessly. A 1% advisory fee plus 0.5% fund expense ratio (typical in actively managed products) removes 1.5%/year from your return. Over 35 years at 7% nominal, a 1.5% fee drag reduces the ending balance by roughly 40%. Index funds with 0.03–0.10% expense ratios make the full return available.

A defensible practice: plan around the 5% real scenario (conservative), treat the 7% real scenario as the most likely outcome, and note the 9% real scenario as the upside. Build your savings rate around the 5% scenario; if returns are better, you retire earlier.

Sequence-of-Returns Risk: Why Order Matters

The future-value formula assumes a single constant return every year. Real markets deliver a sequenceof returns — some years +30%, others −40% — and in retirement, the order of those returns matters enormously. This is sequence-of-returns risk.

Consider two retirees, each with a $1M portfolio withdrawing $40,000/year at 4%. Retiree A experiences a 30% loss in year 1 of retirement (portfolio drops to $700,000, then they withdraw $40,000 — $660,000 left). Even if the market averages 7% from year 2 onward, the portfolio must compound from a permanently reduced base. Retiree B experiences the same 30% loss in year 20 instead of year 1 — by then, 19 years of 7% growth have built a large enough cushion that the same loss barely dents the long-run trajectory. The math is identical in terms of average returns; the outcome is wildly different based on timing.

Two practical mitigations: hold 2–3 years of spending in cash or short-term bonds at retirement so you never sell equities into a crash, and consider starting with a 3.5% withdrawal rate instead of 4% in the first five years. The second adjustment alone eliminates most historical failure scenarios. For a rigorous probability-based stress test, pair this calculator with the FIRE Monte Carlo calculator, which runs 500 historical sequence simulations to show the probability distribution around your specific plan.

The 4% Rule Scenarios: What Your Balance Actually Buys

4% safe-withdrawal income by portfolio size

How projected balance translates into annual and monthly retirement income

How projected balance translates into annual and monthly retirement income
Scenario4% income / year4% income / monthWithdrawal years at 4%3.5% income / year (safer)
$500,000 balance$20,000$1,66730+ years$17,500
$1,000,000 balance$40,000$3,33330+ years$35,000
$1,500,000 balance$60,000$5,00030+ years$52,500
$2,000,000 balanceRecommended$80,000$6,66730+ years$70,000
$3,000,000 balance$120,000$10,00030+ years$105,000

The 4% rule assumes a diversified portfolio (50–75% equity) with inflation-adjusted withdrawals. “30+ years” means the portfolio historically survived all 30-year windows in the Trinity Study. The 3.5% column is the Morningstar 2023 updated recommendation for new retirees at 2026 valuations. Social Security income is additive — a household with $1.5M and $36,000/year in Social Security has total retirement income of roughly $60,000 + $36,000 = $96,000.

Common Mistakes When Planning Retirement Savings

  • Using nominal returns instead of real returns.A 10% nominal return becomes roughly 7% real after 3% inflation. If you enter 10% and interpret the output in future-dollar terms, the projected balance is accurate — but $2M in nominal future dollars is not $2M in today’s purchasing power. Use real returns (post-inflation) to get results in today’s dollars, which is what this calculator’s default reflects.
  • Omitting the employer match. A 50% match on the first 6% of a $100,000 salary is $3,000 in free money. Leaving it out of the annual-contribution field understates the projection by 10–20% depending on salary and match terms. Always include the full match-eligible contribution and the match itself.
  • Assuming contributions stay constant in nominal dollars. Real careers see salary rise 3–5% per year. A $12,000 contribution today is likely $20,000 in 15 years in nominal terms. The calculator uses the fixed value you enter; re-run it every few years with updated contribution levels to stay accurate.
  • Forgetting taxes on traditional account withdrawals.A traditional 401(k) or IRA balance is fully pre-tax. A $1.5M traditional balance typically produces only $1.05–1.2M in after-tax retirement income at a 20–30% effective marginal rate. Roth account balances are fully post-tax — what you see is what you spend. A mixed portfolio needs the traditional balance haircut. The calculator does not model taxes; subtract your expected effective retirement rate from the withdrawal for a realistic net-income number.
  • Not running a stress test at 5% return. The single most dangerous mistake is building a retirement plan that only works at 7%+. Run every scenario at 5% as a conservative floor. If the 5% scenario still clears your FIRE number, you have genuine margin of safety. If only 7% clears it, you are one bad decade from working longer.
  • Confusing the FIRE number with the annual savings target. The FIRE number is the total balance you need at retirement. Your annual savings target is whatever contribution rate accumulates that total from your current balance over your remaining working years. If you enter the FIRE number as the annual contribution, you will project a wildly incorrect result.
  • Ignoring Social Security’s role.Social Security is additive to the 4%-rule income and substantially reduces the FIRE number you actually need from savings alone. A household expecting $30,000/year in combined Social Security benefits and targeting $75,000/year in total retirement income only needs $45,000/year from savings — a FIRE number of $1,125,000, not $1,875,000. Check your Social Security estimate at the SSA website before building your target.

When This Calculator Decides For You

The calculator’s output almost always maps to a concrete choice. The five that come up most often:

  1. Whether to contribute beyond the employer match. Run two scenarios: one with match-level contributions, one with the IRS annual 401(k) limit ($23,500 for under-50s in 2026). The future-value difference is your lifetime cost of stopping at the match. For most savers in their 30s, that gap exceeds $400,000 by retirement.
  2. Whether you can retire 5 years earlier than planned. Enter your target age; then enter target minus 5. The earlier scenario simultaneously shortens the compounding window and lengthens the withdrawal years. If the earlier balance still clears the 4% FIRE number comfortably, the early retirement is mathematically supported. If it does not, the gap tells you the required extra savings rate to close it.
  3. How much the side income is actually worth.If a side project adds $10,000/year of investable income, enter it as additional annual contribution for the years you plan to run it. At 7% real and a 20-year remaining horizon, an extra $10,000/year adds roughly $440,000 to the retirement balance — equivalent to nearly 6 years of additional work in some scenarios.
  4. Whether the Roth conversion makes sense.A Roth conversion affects your current-year taxable income but converts pre-tax savings to post-tax. The calculator does not model the conversion itself, but you can compare two scenarios — the current trajectory versus a trajectory where a converted lump is included in after-tax investments (adjusted for the tax owed) — to see whether the long-run difference justifies the current-year tax hit.
  5. Whether the current pace is on track. Enter your numbers and compare the projected balance to your FIRE number. If the balance clears it at 7% and at 5%, you are solidly on track. If it only clears at 7%, you have meaningful risk exposure. If it misses at both, the calculator tells you the size of the gap, which you close by contributing more, retiring later, or targeting a lower withdrawal rate.

Background

A Brief History of US Retirement Savings Policy

The modern US retirement savings system is less than 50 years old. Before 1974, private-sector workers who had retirement savings at all typically depended on defined-benefit pension plans — employers promised a fixed monthly payment at retirement, bearing all investment risk themselves. The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) of 1974 set the first federal standards for private pension plans and simultaneously created the Individual Retirement Account (IRA) [1].

The 401(k) was an accident. Congress added section 401(k) to the Internal Revenue Code in 1978, primarily to clarify the tax treatment of deferred compensation. Benefits consultant Ted Benna noticed in 1980 that the new language allowed employers to match employee contributions, and he designed the first 401(k) plan to use it. Adoption was slow through the 1980s but explosive through the 1990s. By 2000, 401(k) plans held more assets than traditional pensions for the first time — a transfer of investment risk from employer to employee that has defined retirement planning ever since [2].

The 4% safe-withdrawal rate was established by William Bengen in a 1994 Journal of Financial Planning paper, updated repeatedly through 2006 [3]. The Trinity Study (1998) confirmed and popularized it by running the same 30-year withdrawal simulations across all historical market periods. The 2021–2023 inflation surge prompted updated research — Morningstar's 2023 update suggested 3.3–3.8% for new retirees, reflecting both higher starting equity valuations and revised bond-return expectations. The debate over the precise safe rate continues, but the order of magnitude (roughly 4%) has held for 30 years of subsequent market history.

  1. Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) — Overview · U.S. Department of Labor · 1974
  2. 401(k) Plans — History and Overview · Internal Revenue Service
  3. Determining Withdrawal Rates Using Historical Data · Journal of Financial Planning / Financial Planning Association · 1994

Retirement Savings Glossary

Eight terms that appear in every retirement planning conversation. Skim the snippet for the one-line definition; expand the card for the full explanation.

Quick reference

Retirement savings glossary

Future Value (FV)

The projected total balance at a future date, given a starting amount, periodic contributions, and a compounding rate.

FV is the number this calculator produces. It is mathematically exact for the inputs given — the uncertainty lives in whether those inputs (especially the return rate) will hold over decades. FV in real terms (using a real return) is directly comparable to today’s purchasing power; FV in nominal terms is not.

Source: IRS — Retirement Account Basics

4% Rule

Withdraw 4% of your starting portfolio balance in year 1, adjust for inflation each year. Historically sustains 30+ years in 95%+ of market scenarios.

Originated in Bengen (1994) and confirmed in the Trinity Study (1998). The 4% figure is not a guarantee — it is a historical success rate. Long retirements (40+ years), high-equity-valuation starting points, and heavy spending in early retirement all argue for 3.3–3.7% instead. The FIRE community has largely adopted 3.5% as the conservative standard.

FIRE Number

25× your desired annual spending — the total portfolio value at which a 4% withdrawal rate covers your expenses indefinitely.

FIRE stands for Financial Independence, Retire Early. The multiplier of 25 is the algebraic inverse of 0.04. If you need $60,000/year in retirement, your FIRE number is $1.5M. Some practitioners use 28–33× for early retirees (implying a 3–3.5% withdrawal rate) to account for longer horizons.

Sequence-of-Returns Risk

The risk that bad early returns in retirement permanently damage a withdrawal portfolio, even if average returns are fine.

A 30% loss in year 1 forces you to sell more shares to fund withdrawals, locking in losses. Even if the market fully recovers by year 5, the portfolio never catches up because the sold shares are gone. Holding a cash buffer (2–3 years of expenses) and using a dynamic withdrawal strategy (Guyton-Klinger guardrails) are the primary mitigations.

Compound Annuity

A series of equal periodic payments, each of which earns interest from the moment it is made — the math underlying monthly contributions.

The second term in the FV formula is the future value of a compound annuity. The first payment compounds for (almost) the full term; the last payment compounds for one period. This is why front-loading contributions — contributing the maximum as early in the year as possible — modestly outperforms spreading them evenly.

Real vs Nominal Return

Nominal return is the raw investment return. Real return is nominal minus inflation — what actually grows your purchasing power.

A 10% nominal return in a 3% inflation environment is a 7% real return. The calculator’s 7% default is calibrated as a real return so the output is in today’s dollars. If you use a nominal return (10%), the projected balance is larger but denominated in future-inflated dollars — harder to interpret.

Traditional vs Roth

Traditional accounts are pre-tax (taxed on withdrawal); Roth accounts are post-tax (tax-free on withdrawal). The math favors Roth when your future tax rate exceeds your current rate.

A traditional 401(k) reduces taxable income today but creates a future tax bill on all withdrawals. A Roth 401(k) or Roth IRA does not reduce today’s taxes but grows and distributes entirely tax-free. For most workers under 40, Roth is structurally superior assuming tax rates rise. The calculator does not model the tax leg; apply a 20–30% haircut to traditional balances for a net-of-tax estimate.

Source: IRS — Roth IRAs

Employer Match

Free money your employer adds to your 401(k), typically tied to your own contribution rate — the highest-ROI action in retirement planning.

A common match is 50% of your contributions up to 6% of salary. On a $100,000 salary, contributing 6% ($6,000) gets you an additional $3,000 of match — an immediate 50% return before any investment gains. Not capturing the full match is the single most expensive retirement mistake most workers make.

Source: DOL — 401(k) Plans for Small Businesses

Related Planning Tools

Retirement savings is the accumulation phase; several tools cover the surrounding decisions. Use the compound interest calculator to model any single account without the retirement-specific framing — useful for Roth IRAs or taxable brokerage. Use the Roth vs Traditional 401(k) calculator to see whether pre-tax or post-tax contributions produce a better outcome given your current and expected future tax rates. For the Social Security claim-age decision (which year to start claiming benefits), use the Social Security break-even calculator. And once you have a target balance, the inflation calculator translates the real-return number into the nominal future-dollar balance, useful for setting expectations with a financial advisor who works in nominal terms.

Sources & Methodology

The formulas, thresholds, and benchmarks behind this calculator are anchored to the primary sources below. Where a study or agency document is the underlying authority, we link straight to it — not a summary or republished version.

  1. Social Security Administration — Retirement Estimator and PIA Formula· Social Security Administration

    Federal source for the Primary Insurance Amount formula and benefit projection methodology core to retirement-income modeling.

    Accessed

  2. IRS Publication 590-A — Contributions to IRAs· Internal Revenue Service

    Federal authority on Traditional/Roth IRA contribution limits, deductibility, and phase-out thresholds used in retirement projections.

    Accessed

  3. IRS Publication 590-B — Distributions from IRAs· Internal Revenue Service

    Federal authority on RMDs, distribution rules, and the Uniform Lifetime Table used to model post-retirement withdrawals.

    Accessed

  4. Federal Reserve — Survey of Consumer Finances: Retirement Wealth· Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

    Federal triennial dataset benchmarking U.S. household retirement-account balances by age cohort.

    Accessed

  5. Bengen — Determining Withdrawal Rates Using Historical Data (J Financial Planning, 1994)· Financial Planning Association

    Peer-reviewed practitioner research establishing the 4% safe-withdrawal-rate framework used in retirement-spending models.

    Accessed

  6. DOL EBSA — Lifetime Income Disclosure Methodology· U.S. Department of Labor Employee Benefits Security Administration

    Federal regulation under SECURE Act mandating lifetime-income projections — methodology standard for retirement calculators.

    Accessed

Frequently Asked Questions

The most common questions we get about this calculator — each answer is kept under 60 words so you can scan.

  • What is the 4% rule?
    The Trinity-study-based safe-withdrawal rate. Withdraw 4% of your initial portfolio value in year 1, adjust for inflation each year. Studies of 1926-2015 US market data show this lasts 30+ years in 95% of historical scenarios. Translates to: you need 25× your annual withdrawal as a portfolio (the 'FIRE number'). To withdraw $50k/year, target $1.25M; $80k/year, target $2M.
  • What's a realistic expected return?
    S&P 500 real return (after inflation) over the long run is ~7%. Bond-heavy portfolios return 3-5% real. Aggressive growth equities can return 8-10% but with higher volatility. Most planners use 6-7% as a conservative working estimate. Plug in lower numbers if you want a stress test — the calculator's output at 5% is your worst-realistic-case.
  • How accurate is the future-value projection?
    Mathematically exact given the inputs. Reality is messier: actual returns are lumpy (some years +30%, others -20%), inflation isn't constant, and real-life events disrupt savings habits. Use the projection as a target, not a promise. Re-run annually with updated current-savings + return assumptions to see if you're on track.
  • Should I use today's dollars or future dollars?
    Today's dollars — that's what the calculator returns. The 'expected return' input should be the REAL return (post-inflation): use 7% for stocks, not 10% (which is the nominal). This way the future-value number is comparable to today's purchasing power. If you enter nominal return (10%), the FV is in nominal future dollars, which is a misleadingly large number.
  • What about Social Security or pensions?
    Out of scope — the calculator models only your savings, not income from external sources. Add Social Security separately: most US retirees receive $1,800-2,500/mo, which reduces the savings target substantially. If you'll get $24k/yr from SS and need $60k/yr total, your savings only need to cover $36k/yr — that's a $900k FIRE number, not $1.5M.
  • How much should I save toward retirement?
    The classic guideline: save 15% of gross income from age 25 to retire comfortably at 65. If you started later, push to 20-25%. The calculator lets you reverse-engineer this — set your target FV (or FIRE number), back-solve for the annual contribution that hits it. Many calculators offer a 'required savings' mode; this one doesn't, but you can iterate manually.
  • Is the 4% rule still safe?
    Debated. Recent research (Bengen's update, Morningstar 2023) suggests 3.5-3.8% is safer for 30-year retirements at current valuations. 4.5-5% works for 25-year retirements. Use 4% as the rule-of-thumb; pull it down to 3.5% if you want extra cushion or expect to retire before 50 (longer horizon needs lower withdrawal).
  • What's sequence-of-returns risk?
    Bad early returns hurt more than bad late returns. If the market drops 30% in year 1 of retirement, your portfolio takes a permanent hit because you're now drawing from a smaller base. The 4% rule survives this in 95% of historical scenarios but not 100% — common mitigations: hold 2-3 years of expenses in cash/bonds, reduce withdrawals 10% in down years (Guyton-Klinger guardrails), or delay retirement by 1-2 years if a recession hits as you near the date.
  • Does this account for taxes?
    No. FV is pre-tax. Tax-deferred accounts (traditional 401k, IRA) get fully taxed on withdrawal at your then-marginal rate. Roth accounts (Roth 401k, Roth IRA) are tax-free. Taxable brokerage is taxed on capital gains (15-20% for most). Subtract roughly 15-25% from the FV to get post-tax purchasing power for a typical mixed portfolio.
  • What return assumption do FIRE communities use?
    Most FIRE planners use 5-7% real return — conservative. The Mr. Money Mustache crowd uses 5%; ChooseFI typically 7%. The Bogleheads boards split between 5% (very conservative) and 7% (long-run-historical). Avoid 10%+ assumptions; that's a marketing number from financial-services salespeople, not a planning number.
  • Can I retire on $500k?
    At a 4% rule that's $20k/year — supplemented by Social Security ($25k average), you're at $45k/year, near US median. Doable in low-cost-of-living areas, tight in high-cost areas. The calculator won't tell you 'enough' because that's location- and lifestyle-specific. Run several scenarios: tight ($40k withdrawal), comfortable ($60k), comfortable+travel ($80k), and see what FIRE numbers each requires.
  • What if my employer matches contributions?
    Add the match to your 'annual contribution' input. If you contribute $10k and your employer matches $5k (50% match up to 6% of salary), enter $15k. The full $15k benefits from compounding. Maxing employer match is the highest-ROI move in retirement planning — you're getting an instant 50-100% return on the matched portion.